| Pages: (5) « First ... 3 4 [5] ( Go to first unread post ) | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| hiryu |
Posted: Apr 29 2010, 06:11 PM
|
||
|
[lil noob] ![]() Group: Real Members Posts: 5 Member No.: 378 Joined: 17-March 09 |
Yes, if you tap the upside-down one, it will go in the fourth direction. And nemryn got the method... animate a land and Cytoshape into Gardener. Regarding Sakashima + flipped card, according to modo the name stays as Sakashima, so they're not destroyed. |
||
| sexican |
Posted: Apr 29 2010, 07:04 PM
|
![]() A dinnar is YOU ![]() Group: Spambots Posts: 1,215 Member No.: 303 Joined: 29-September 08 |
From Cotton Rhetoric's latest column:
This post has been edited by sexican on Apr 29 2010, 07:04 PM -------------------- No, Galactus can eat me and my family. I do not want to save 32% per issue.
|
| prolepsis9 |
Posted: Apr 30 2010, 04:21 AM
|
![]() custom user title ![]() Group: Chat Krew Cash Krew Posts: 3,237 Member No.: 73 Joined: 20-December 07 |
That's lame, he didn't crop the licids from the shot.
|
| FyrexianSurvivr |
Posted: Apr 30 2010, 12:59 PM
|
![]() Sexier Than Gary Busey ![]() Group: Spambots Posts: 2,847 Member No.: 10 Joined: 17-December 07 |
Two questions:
If I have a [card]Valakut Fireboar[/card] with an [card]Ogre's Cleaver[/card] on it, and it attacks, what does it turn into? If I have a [card]Lavaclaw Reaches[/card] enchanted with a [card]Wind Zendikon[/card] and I activate it, does it overwrite the zendikon or is it a flying firebreather? |
| Vandermonde |
Posted: Apr 30 2010, 01:02 PM
|
||
![]() Busier than Gary Sexy ![]() Group: Vanguards Posts: 1,934 Member No.: 270 Joined: 6-August 08 |
how could it ever be a flying firebreather? even without knowing the specific rules, one or the other is going to 'win', and neither case makes what you want edit: i take it back, you can for all intents and purposes -- if not technically -- get a flying firebreather, but it's the same case that you listed as an alternative XD This post has been edited by Vandermonde on Apr 30 2010, 01:03 PM |
||
| KingRamz |
Posted: Apr 30 2010, 01:04 PM
|
||
![]() [time traveler] ![]() Group: Real Members Posts: 345 Member No.: 492 Joined: 28-December 09 |
You have a flying black-and-red firebreather. It's similar to being able to stack lifelink with [CARD]Genju of the Fields[/CARD] back when stacking lifelink mattered. I also for a little while had a R/W/U deck built around playing multiple different Genjus on dual lands and taking advantage of this interaction to do things like make a 6/1 flyer. EDIT: Apparently the Genju doesn't actually grant lifelink, so this trick will still work. It doesn't matter for the purposes of your rules question, though. This post has been edited by KingRamz on Apr 30 2010, 01:06 PM |
||
| zaphod |
Posted: Apr 30 2010, 01:05 PM
|
![]() Just zis guy, you know? ![]() Group: Spambots Posts: 1,392 Member No.: 153 Joined: 16-February 08 |
P/T switching is always applied last. Layer 7e.
-------------------- On turn 4, an elite knight was targeted for an attack he didn't commit. He promptly escaped from an oblivion ring. Today, still wanted by the opponent he survives as a creature of fortune. If you need to get past a wall of reverence. If you can afford WUBRG and you can find him, maybe you can hire...Dragonsoul Knight.
-Vandermonde |
| sexican |
Posted: Apr 30 2010, 01:06 PM
|
||
![]() A dinnar is YOU ![]() Group: Spambots Posts: 1,215 Member No.: 303 Joined: 29-September 08 |
But I hardly know her, 7e. -------------------- No, Galactus can eat me and my family. I do not want to save 32% per issue.
|
||
| zaphod |
Posted: Apr 30 2010, 01:09 PM
|
![]() Just zis guy, you know? ![]() Group: Spambots Posts: 1,392 Member No.: 153 Joined: 16-February 08 |
That would be 7 {e}.
-------------------- On turn 4, an elite knight was targeted for an attack he didn't commit. He promptly escaped from an oblivion ring. Today, still wanted by the opponent he survives as a creature of fortune. If you need to get past a wall of reverence. If you can afford WUBRG and you can find him, maybe you can hire...Dragonsoul Knight.
-Vandermonde |
| wcbarksdale |
Posted: Apr 30 2010, 01:46 PM
|
||
![]() custom user title ![]() Group: Chat Krew Posts: 1,625 Member No.: 62 Joined: 19-December 07 |
The basic reason is the effects of both cards are separable. The Reaches ability will overwrite the colors and p/t and grant firebreathing, but it doesn't take away flying any more than playing [card]Vigilance[/card] on a [card]Wind Drake[/card] does. This post has been edited by wcbarksdale on Apr 30 2010, 01:49 PM -------------------- In all ways, the Cockatrice is like the Thicket Basilisk. Look there for rulings.
|
||
| nemryn |
Posted: Apr 30 2010, 02:08 PM
|
||||
|
custom user title ![]() Group: Spambots Posts: 856 Member No.: 342 Joined: 24-December 08 |
This is why the second form of [CARD]Chimeric Sphere[/CARD] explicitly does not have flying. |
||||
| wcbarksdale |
Posted: Apr 30 2010, 03:27 PM
|
![]() custom user title ![]() Group: Chat Krew Posts: 1,625 Member No.: 62 Joined: 19-December 07 |
Idle thought. Suppose you had a [card]Boggart Shenanigans[/card] that got animated and became a Soldier somehow. You'd have a Tribal Enchantment Creature -- Goblin Soldier, but specifically Goblin is a subtype of Tribal and Soldier is a subtype of Creature. Call it a (Tribal-Goblin) Enchantment (Creature-Soldier). Would this be in any way functionally different from a (Tribal-Soldier) Enchantment (Creature-Goblin), e.g. a [card]Veteran's Armanents[/card] that got animated and became a Goblin?
-------------------- In all ways, the Cockatrice is like the Thicket Basilisk. Look there for rulings.
|
| nemryn |
Posted: Apr 30 2010, 03:50 PM
|
|
custom user title ![]() Group: Spambots Posts: 856 Member No.: 342 Joined: 24-December 08 |
Well obv it makes a difference if you hit it with an effect that makes it stop being a creature, but I can't think of anything else atm.
This post has been edited by nemryn on Apr 30 2010, 03:50 PM |
| Seol |
Posted: Apr 30 2010, 04:48 PM
|
![]() [galactic anomaly] ![]() Group: Real Members Posts: 272 Member No.: 44 Joined: 18-December 07 |
there's no difference between a "tribal type" and a creature type: tribals have creature types. subtypes are subtypes of the card, not of the type: it's just something can only have a creature type if it's a creature or a tribal.
and i don't think that last bit's a requirement: making something suddenly not a creature doesn't make it lose its creature type. or at least i can't see anything in the rules that suggests it would. do licids become not licids when they enchant something? This post has been edited by Seol on Apr 30 2010, 04:50 PM |
| nemryn |
Posted: Apr 30 2010, 04:55 PM
|
|
custom user title ![]() Group: Spambots Posts: 856 Member No.: 342 Joined: 24-December 08 |
I think they do, yeah. 'Licid' isn't an enchantment type.
|
| Seol |
Posted: Apr 30 2010, 05:04 PM
|
||
![]() [galactic anomaly] ![]() Group: Real Members Posts: 272 Member No.: 44 Joined: 18-December 07 |
no it isn't, but there's nothing in the rules which talks about permanents losing subtypes if they lose the type that they normally relate to. the implication is that the splitting of subtypes into creature type, land type etc is primarily semantic, and to prevent for example turning mountains into goblins using artificial evolution. |
||
| llarack |
Posted: Apr 30 2010, 05:44 PM
|
||||
![]() custom user title ![]() Group: Archowners Posts: 2,843 Member No.: 74 Joined: 20-December 07 |
Nice! -------------------- 3:34 WrathOfMooCow: if i was killed by draco
3:34 WrathOfMooCow: i might quit magic me: I'm crushing the momir slearch: I'm crushing an even more luck-based format: extended Ridiculous Hat: once you go hat you never go... back...t - Rotisserie Cube Draft (2nd place) - Single Word Constructed Winner! |
||||
Pages: (5) « First ... 3 4 [5] |
![]() ![]() ![]() |